When I think back over the past decade of my work in Sierra Leone's care reform movement, one thing has become increasingly clear: true, sustainable change is not delivered from the outside in, it grows from the inside out. And at the center of that growth are local leaders, men and women who understand their communities, feel the weight of their people's challenges, and carry a vision for transformation. I've spent much of my professional life walking alongside children and families through the Child Reintegration Centre (CRC ) in Bo, Sierra Leone. When I began this journey, I was part of team shifting from institutional care to family-based care, a major transition not only for our organization, but for our mindset, our systems, and our partnerships. That transformation was not easy. It took more than just funding or training. It took trust, trust in local leadership. Why local leaders are better equipped to respond to the needs of their communities As local leaders, we know our communities deeply, not just in theory, but in lived experience. We understand the indirect cultural dynamics, the importance of engaging elders and chiefs, and the power of community consensus. We speak hte language, not just Krio or Mende, but the language of relationship and shared history. I remember a case vividly; a small orphanage in Kenema, Grace Foundation (a client of the CRC's Transition Coaching and Mentoring (TCM) Department), who had lost access to their building through the owner. The children were at risk of being displaced with nowhere to go. There were no quick international solutions. But because we, as a local team, were already embedded in the community, we moved fast. We worked directly with the program manager, Mr. Moinina. Together, we mobilized church families to temporarily host the children and began a reintegration process grounded in care, dignity and local connection. That crisis didn't require a foreign response, it needed a trusted local response. And that's what we gave. How empowerment builds ownership and avoids long-term dependency One of the most powerful things I've seen in my years at CRC is what happens when local people are not just invited to the table, but given space to lead. When you empower someone to be part of the solution, they begin to take ownership. Through CRC and our collaborations, we've trained social workers, community leaders and caregivers on family reintegration, case management, and child protection. After these trainings, many communities formed their own child welfare committees, meeting regularly, identifying vulnerable families, and taking proactive steps to keep children safe and united with their families. They weren't waiting for another workshop or donation. They took the tools and ran with them. That's the kind of leadership that lasts. What outside partners can do to support (but not contro) local leadership I've also learned that the quality of international partnerships can make or break a movement. Fortunately, in my experience with Helping Children Worldwide (HCW) - our allies, and other global partners, I've seen what good partnership looks like. They didn't come in with all the answers. They listened. They learned. They invested, not just in programs, but in people. They helped us train and equip our team, supported us during tough reintegration cases, and allowed us to shape the vision for our work. Their question was always, "How can we support you?" not "Here's how to do it." The role of community collaboration in creating real, lasting change When we reunited a child with a family, it's not just a process, it's a story of restoration. But we don't do it alone. We involved the village chief, the school teacher, the local pastor, the neighbor who keeps an eye out. These aren't just service providers. They are protectors, connectors and champions. Sustainable change happens when everyone has a role to play. When a community feels that a child belongs to them, they stand up for that child. This is why empowering local leadership is not just a development strategy, it's a commitment to dignity. It's saying, "You are enough. You are capable. You are the answer." Conclusion: Change that lasts starts here Sierra Leone, like many nations, faces enormous challenges. But what gives me hope is the incredible strength and resilience I see in our local leaders every day, those in villages and cities, in schools and churches, in homes and offices. These leaders aren't waiting to be rescued. They're ready to lead. Our job as practitioners, as partners, as allies, is to walk alongside them. To provide tools, training, and trust. To invest in their growth and believe in their potential Because when local leaders rise, entire communities rise with them. And that is how real, lasting, and sustainable change is born. David Titus MusaSenior Consultant, Transition Coaching and Mentoring Department
0 Comments
Empowerment is not giving people what we think they need; it’s creating space for them to shape their own futureIn Emmanuel Nabieu’s new book, The Empowerment Shift: A Transformational Guide to Transitioning from Residential Care to Family Care (available on Amazon), he explores why moving from institutional orphanage care to family and community-based care is not just a programmatic change, but a transformational shift in mindset, purpose, and impact. The following excerpt from Chapter 1 (pages 24–28) explains why this shift is so critical—and how it can only succeed through empowerment, collaboration, and locally led leadership. Transitioning from orphanage care to family and community support is more than a change in operational strategy—it is a profound shift in mindset, purpose, and impact. The Empowerment Shift is about flipping the traditional model of aid upside down. It moves away from dependency-creating handouts toward a sustainable “hand-up” approach that restores dignity, builds resilience, and creates lasting change for families, communities, and the mission itself. The Empowerment Shift is about putting families back at the center of care, equipping them to nurture, protect, and thrive together. This shift recognizes that:
If you’d like to dive deeper into these ideas and explore more stories and practical insights, you can find The Empowerment Shift available on Amazon [HERE]. It offers a fuller picture of how this transformational approach is changing lives around the world. Communities flourish when families are empowered. This transformation isn’t limited to individual households—it sparks a collective revival of social and economic health. Through family care:
This shift represents a profound alignment with the heart of the child welfare mission and ministry to care for children. It recognizes that caring for children means addressing not only their tangible needs—like food, shelter, and education—but also their intangible needs: the love, connection, and belonging that only a family can provide. Children thrive when their physical, emotional, and spiritual needs are met holistically. By transitioning to family care, this shift reflects a commitment to caring for the whole child and nurturing the bonds that give them the foundation to flourish. Families are the first and most enduring source of love and connection for children. When empowered, families can provide the stability and support that children need to grow, heal, and thrive in every aspect of their lives.
This shift is not the end of the mission but the beginning of its expansion. It transforms the approach to caring for children, creating opportunities to touch the lives of many more children, families, and communities. By empowering families and communities, this shift enables organizations and ministries to:
This is not just a shift—it is a transformation. It is the beginning of a movement that puts love, dignity, and hope at the center of care. The Empowerment Shift is the gateway to a brighter, more connected, and more empowered future for all. When families are empowered, they grow stronger, children thrive, communities flourish, and the world becomes a better place for everyone. One of the most common questions asked when discussing the transition from orphanage to family care is: who should initiate the shift? Is it the responsibility of the local stakeholders, such as the orphanage director, founder, or board of directors? Or should it come from the international donors and funding organizations, who often provide the financial resources to sustain the orphanage? The answer is both nuanced and simple: while the shift is most effective and sustainable when initiated by local stakeholders, it requires the full support, partnership, and resources of international donors and organizations to succeed. A truly transformational shift to family care is a collaborative process, intentionally designed to empower both local leaders and international partners to work together in a shared mission of advancing child welfare. Typically, the most impactful shifts to family care are led by local stakeholders. While the initial idea may come from various parties, including partners or donors, it is essential for local leaders to take a leading role. This ensures the initiative is sustainable, as locally driven efforts are better positioned to understand and respond to community needs and long-term goals.
I can say it plainly. Project funding models are easy to sell to donors, but they weaken our ability to create lasting change. When most people give to international humanitarian nonprofits, they want to see results they can measure and celebrate: a school built, a well dug, a shipment of medicine delivered. These time-bound projects with concrete outputs are easier to fundraise for, easier to photograph, and easier to explain. But there’s a hidden cost to this approach—one that directly undermines the long-term sustainability of local communities and the capacity of international NGOs (INGOs) to do the work that truly lasts. The Hidden Gap: Capacity Building vs. Project Outputs Real change doesn’t come from a single project. It comes from local leaders becoming creative problem-solvers, local communities taking ownership of their futures, and local organizations gaining the skills and authority to design and lead their own initiatives. Raising local staff capacity to reach this level is the kind of slow, labor-intensive work that rarely fits neatly into a donor’s one-year project cycle. When donors focus their giving only on specific projects, INGOs are left scrambling to deliver “outputs” while sidelining the essential but less visible work of capacity building. As a result, communities remain dependent on external help instead of developing the systems and leadership needed to stand on their own. The Work Behind the Scenes That Donors Rarely See Even among donors who value “locally led initiatives,” support is often limited to funding the project itself. What’s missing is support for the staff who make local leadership possible. Behind every successful, community-driven initiative is a team of skilled professionals at INGOs:
This is not quick or easy work. It requires years of education, training, cross-cultural experience, and professional expertise. It also requires highly creative, curious, patient, and intelligent people—individuals who could easily earn more in the for-profit sector but choose this work out of dedication to justice and human dignity. Funding Local Staff Salaries Is Funding Sustainability When donors provide resources that allow local organizations to hire, train, and retain their own staff, they are directly investing in the self-sufficiency of communities. Local staff members are the ones who remain after international teams leave. They understand the culture, the language, and the history of their communities. Funding their salaries is not an “extra”—it is the single most reliable way to ensure that capacity and leadership stay rooted where they are needed most. Why INGO Program Staff Salaries Also Matter At the same time, international program staff play a vital role in helping local organizations build the skills, systems, and strategies to thrive. They are the facilitators, trainers, curriculum designers, researchers, evaluators, and relationship builders who make collaboration effective. Without stable funding for these roles, INGOs cannot provide the mentorship and technical support that helps local leaders translate vision into practice. Funding staff salaries at INGOs is not overhead—it is the very engine of capacity building. The Myth of Overhead and the Cost of Disfavor Unfortunately, a long time ago the definition of charitable activities got tangled up with charitable purpose, and anything a nonprofit does to operate is treated as extraneous activity. The donor has been conditioned to disfavor funding for all nonprofit employee salaries, but particularly for staff who manage the organization's ability to function. This restriction on using donations to pay for so-called “overhead” such as financial, accounting, fundraising, and administrative oversight staff cripples INGOs. It's also a tiny bit of an Alice in Wonderland dilemma. Every donor expects rigorous oversight, flawless reporting, and responsible management of funds, yet they often characterize those things as outside of the nonprofit mission purpose and even more often will decline to provide funding to pay for the professionals who provide it. Without adequate investment in accountants, compliance officers, operations managers, and administrators, INGOs struggle to meet basic expectations—let alone develop the kind of forward-thinking strategies needed to address global challenges like eradicating disease, dismantling poverty, ending illiteracy, and confronting injustice and violence. Political Expediency and Government Apathy Increased the Burden on INGOs The situation is worsened by the fact that governments and government aid agencies, particularly in Europe, North America, and other developed regions, have increasingly pulled back from funding aid to communities in need, both at home and in foreign lands. When governments fail to invest in these essentials, nonprofits are left carrying the weight. Case in point - the closure of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) ended a great deal of direct funding, and all of the capacity building work being done by the USAID professionals employed by the agency. That work supported capacity in local programs, and energized NGOS and INGOs who were collaborating on multi-year cross-organizational initiatives. This makes the work of small, medium and large INGO staff more crucial than ever—they are left to bridge the gaps and equip local organizations, and they are providing the expertise and continuity that governments and agencies have neglected to fund. Why Disfavor for Funding Salaries Matters More Than Donors Realize And here is the uncomfortable truth: without funding for staff salaries, none of this happens. Donors love to fund a clinic. They are less enthusiastic about funding the staff who train local midwives, design safe medical protocols, or monitor the clinic’s effectiveness over time. Yet it is precisely these people who ensure that projects succeed and communities thrive long after the donor dollars are spent. Every donor expects INGOs to provide monitoring, evaluation, oversight, and reporting—to shepherd donor dollars with more precision than many for-profit investment managers. But these tasks are almost never funded directly. Instead, nonprofits are forced to cobble together restricted grants, stretch thin resources, or divert time away from true capacity building just to keep up with compliance. The Way Forward If international humanitarian work is to fulfill its promise, we need a shift in donor perception. Donors must begin to see that:
|
Follow us on social media
Archive
October 2025
Click the button to read heartfelt tributes to a beloved Bishop, co- founder of our mission!
Post
|
